Y_Po wrote:
I am skeptical ppt levels can me measured, certainly not on random sample and by ordinary means.
And as far as I can tell nobody except Weir claimed it. And we all know that Mr. Weir likes to "exaggerate".
In any case, I doubt very much that "certification" involved any actual purity measurement.
and one more thing, high purity will not help him to achieve claimed ED.
I'm sorry ... you can't measure in random samples... WTF ?
The testing consisted of the production line running and the tester taking samples from the production line.
You call BS on who ? The testing lab ?
I call BS on your idiotic statement that purity won't help ED. Caps fail from oxidation and impurities/imperfections that lead to .... breakdown. Higher purity will raise the ED before failure at least for impurities and I would also thing imperfections to some degree.
The tests are done the Barium nitrate and chelate/oxolate are proven in actual production line tests. As usual your tempts to re-write history are re-buffed. EEstor have proven results for chemical purity from the production line. EEStor have delivered everything they hve promised up to this point (delivery of an EESU) and the ip they have generated is extremly valuable.
If you have some valid points to raise do it, and please don't make a sweeping statement then call every one an idiot and depart.
Mark
