TheEEStory.com

News, reviews and Discussion of EEStor Inc.
Sun, 24 Jan 2010, 8:01am Do you think that this thread is Evidence that EESU Deniers are out of touch with Reality? »
Mark
EEluminated
Skull
Registered: Aug, 2008
Last visit: 20 minutes ago
Posts: 613

Ok
proffesor Tom

Can we agree that they have.

4 Patents
Barium Nitrate that is purer than anything made before.
CMBT best purity ,crystalization and homogenity of particle size ever made.
A production line with certification of the chemical production.

They have in fact mapped out how to cheaply produce breakthrough chemicals in a novel manner. Then actually produced in quantity what they have previously applied for ip protection on.

My question is how they have arrived at the need to make the chemicals, combine them and go on to produce a component without having vast previous knowledge of the required specifications to produce a high ED capacitor.

Everything we see is aimed at not producing a lab sample, but to produce in quantity chemicals, in quantity CMBT and in quantity production line derived EESU's.

While I would believe that a person that was trying to do this with no previous experience in high volume high quality low defect production might try going directly to production. It is inconcievable the Weir and Nelson would do this. They have a history of producing what they say they will. They have a history of successful patents. They have no history of faking experiments or experimental data or patent data.

Lets state some facts.
You have not seen or tested Barium or CMBT of this purity or even partices size.

You have not seen or tested Cmbt as above with a 100angstrom Al2O3 coating.

You have not seen or tested a dielectric as above immersed in a PET matrix with Al electrodes polled at +2kv-2kv.

Yet you are happy to pronounce that it is impossible.

So much for scientific curiosity and so much for testing the hypothesis.

Mark

Offline