starm_ wrote:
If they do not have the technology they claim to have EESTOR is definitely practicing fraud.
I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV), but I rather suspect the court would require a person or company to demonstrate that EEStor had used the patent to mislead them (not you) into investing money in EEStor, before they (not you) would have a legal basis to claim fraud.
The purpose of a patent is to establish exclusive rights to a specific product, so that it can be sold at a profit. It is not any sort of proof that a technology either exists or works.
