TheEEStory.com

Seakell wrote:

EEnigma posted a V-k table a post #3 in
http://www.theeestory.com/topics/2035#

I made a graph with all ten komponents:
http://www.theeestory.com/files/voltage-to-k_gr...

To mee it's interesting to see two things, the curves seems to decrease slower than linear, and
they cross.
I don't know, but the way they cross indicate actual measurement more than numbercrunching to me.
One thing I din't like though is that the average deviation is falling with increasing voltage..
Then again, what do I know...

To supply deviation numbers to your graph, see: http://theeestory.com/posts/32277

As you state, the standard deviations decrease as the voltage increases. I thought this odd at first. I was only looking at using statistical analysis as a way of proving or disproving whether the data in the Eestor patent were fabricated or not. I came to the conclusion that the data were not fabricated because the standard deviations ran counter to what is intuitive (at least to me - and also nanocarbons who opined on this in another thread). Should someone fabricate data, they would at least make up numbers that are intuitive.

Now that I consider the standard deviations a second time, it makes sense to me on a physical level. As you can see from your graph and my calculations, the standard deviations go down very slightly when the components are tested over increasing voltages. This could be due to a curing effect on the composition by applying increasing voltage. After all, the composition is a polymer. One would expect the measurements of the physical properties of a polymer (whatever those properties to be) to exhibit less deviation over the course of its curing.

Any analysis of the Eestor composition that does not consider the PET to be an integral part of that composition should be interpreted with a grain or two of salt (pun fully intended).

Last edited Tue, 02 Jun 2009, 12:09pm by DAP