Easy questions.
Was / is Mr. Andrew Burke aware of the apparent test data included in the "WIPO" patent application(05812758.0) ?
In particular, for example, on page 24:
Is that the sort of table Mr. Burke, or another qualified independent examiner, would expect to create as part of "component" verifcation? If not, what sort of information would likely be needed to be produced to validate the claim of K=18,000 or better?
If the presented permittivity claims cannot be validated, then such tables are either fraudulent or for some reason not repeatable - aka cold fusion?
Does Quantum Tunneling make this ceramic battery work???
