http://bariumtitanate.blogspot.com/2009/11/eest...
File:
http://www.cedarparktx.us/cp/systems/file_downl...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off...
Last edited Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:13pm by eestorblog
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:06pm | #1 |
|---|---|
|
http://bariumtitanate.blogspot.com/2009/11/eest... File: http://www.cedarparktx.us/cp/systems/file_downl... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off... Last edited Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:13pm by eestorblog |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:15pm | #2 |
|---|---|
|
It wasn't for a building permit, it's for a certificate of occupany |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:20pm | #3 |
|---|---|
|
Is this the thread where we should put our funny guesses at to what the additional space is for? Dick Weir will not go quietly in the night, he will bring forth the new EESU, for EESU reveal day is our Independence day! - Futureman 100/10 |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:20pm | #4 |
|---|---|
|
which must mean that they are already in? |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:22pm | #5 |
|---|---|
|
The permit is for occupancy and states that EEStor now own #110. I think you should check with the developer to see whether they are expanding, or moving. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:26pm | #6 |
|---|---|
|
Eestor expanding their space (in August) with 2,800 sq.ft. is excellent news. Wonder if this thread will be drowned by all the skeptics who are on a mission to kill any enthusiasm out there. Must be hard to convince people that this is just part of the grand scamming scheme. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:31pm | #7 |
|---|---|
|
With our luck E E Store, Inc. (as listed on the permit list) is a completely different company than EEStor; specializing in storage bins or something. Sure would be nice to see someone post something from the Cedar Park local paper Employment section calling for a production supervisor for Eestor or the like "Must be available to start prior to 2010". I'm really ready to retire so let's get this show on the road. As you can see, I'm already sloughing off at work with my head stuck in this forum in anticipation of this breakthrough. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:41pm | #8 |
|---|---|
|
Time will tell who the morons are! |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:43pm | #9 |
|---|---|
|
Yes, this will be very exciting, so much in fact that I'm afraid I will excrement in my pants! :-) Lensman scale: 8.0
|
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:45pm | #10 |
|---|---|
|
LOL!
As I said ...good luck ...Clearly skeptics can't possibly consider this a good thing for their arguments. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:47pm | #11 |
|---|---|
|
Just curious Joshua, why do you have so many (30+) different user names? I'm still here on the launch pad. Light the fuse, I'll try to hold on! |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:48pm | #12 |
|---|---|
|
speculation is on regarding who did the mispelling?
Lensman scale: 8.0
|
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:52pm | #13 |
|---|---|
|
I'm a script writer!!! What hasn't been reported yet is that the local sex shop has completly sold out of blow up sex dolls, and as this reporter has learned, someone with the initials DW made the purchase late last week and is currently positioning them behind desks and fake wooden robots in his newly rented quarters in Cedar Park. Apparently, as this reported has learned DW will be meeting with some reps. from the power gen. business later this week and wants things to look man_ed and ready. Fortunately during a telephone interview that I had late yesterday afternoon DW admitted that things are not going well at all. Seems that the "blow ups" only hold their initial blowing up for 7 to 10 minutes which after DW read the instructions is all the blow ups were originally design to be inflated for. I suggested to DW that this might work in his favour. By the time his guests arrive to tour the new premises his new employees will look drawn and haggard and slighly wrinkled appearing that they have been working day and night providing the world with earth shaking technology. After all I explained to Dick, if it were me working for the past 4 or 5 hours on ground braking technology I would certainly consider it a favour if someone would come along about 2 oclock in the afternoon, pull out my stopper and wrap their mouths around my plug and breathe new life into me....just before the next big deal is signed. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:54pm | #14 |
|---|---|
|
How's that??? |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 4:57pm | #15 |
|---|---|
|
What does that mean? You're suggesting he become repetitive like you? And for the record, the proof isn't in the pudding. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. But apparently, until the pudding is eaten, the pudding must be a scam. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:01pm | #16 |
|---|---|
|
Oh, OK Sorry Joshua, and please tell
I'm still here on the launch pad. Light the fuse, I'll try to hold on! |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:05pm | #17 |
|---|---|
|
I know fully what to expect. There will either be positive results or not. I'm prepared either way. And thanks for clarifying - now that I know you're another dickhead troll with an agenda, I'll happily ignore you. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:09pm | #18 |
|---|---|
|
Oh..... and please tell the others that I apologize for leaving them off the list. I'm still here on the launch pad. Light the fuse, I'll try to hold on! |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:19pm | #19 |
|---|---|
|
Slippery Little Troll would be a great name for a rock band. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:21pm | #20 |
|---|---|
|
Not necessarily - it's possible that you just have nothing better to do than come in here and troll. But, I'm going to stick with my original hypothesis and say you're an agenda-driven troll. Thus far there's been nothing to indicate otherwise. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:42pm | #21 |
|---|---|
|
I think you're confusing 'wit' with lies. A BEV + an ESSU and Nanosolar's thin-film solar cells on the roof = a True Zero Emissions vehicle. :) |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:45pm | #22 |
|---|---|
|
Is that the BEST you can come up with? You call that 'wit'? LOL...typical response from someone who has been OUTED! LOL A BEV + an ESSU and Nanosolar's thin-film solar cells on the roof = a True Zero Emissions vehicle. :) |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:49pm | #23 |
|---|---|
|
Hahaha...too LAZY to correct them? Tell us another story instead of more lies...geesh! Your lies are beginning to pile up...pretty soon it is going to look like s***. A BEV + an ESSU and Nanosolar's thin-film solar cells on the roof = a True Zero Emissions vehicle. :) |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:52pm | #24 |
|---|---|
|
Well, this is totally in line with what they have stated they would /were doing. So not really news, more like ammo/grist for the anti/pro-scam. for all of you here, please go download the file "Eye catching photos" in the files section. cause you all need to "Zen" out a bit. Lens scale 5/3.75 waiting for good news. I was as high as 8/6 but the waiting is whittling me down. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 5:54pm | #25 |
|---|---|
|
Joshua, which one of you has the best sense of humor? Elijah Caleb Kevin Justin Logan Nathan Benjamin Samuel Zachary Dylan Christian Brandon Jonathan John James Tyler Ryan Alexander David Nicholas Anthony William Joseph Ethan Daniel Andrew Christopher Matthew Michael Jacob tralphie1 or tralphie? Who ever it is, go get him and come back. I'm still here on the launch pad. Light the fuse, I'll try to hold on! |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 6:02pm | #26 |
|---|---|
|
Larry, why don't you think it is better to verify rather than jump off on assumptions? Have you forgotten that recent episode with people thinking NASA had EEStor product to test? |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 6:03pm | #27 |
|---|---|
|
Joshua has been deleted for regeristing with an invalid email address. Tom Villars |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 6:05pm | #28 |
|---|---|
|
WT it won't hurt to verify. Then you will know for certain. |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 6:11pm | #29 |
|---|---|
|
Clerk: "So your company name is E-STORE"
Lensman scale: 6.0 |
| Offline | Link |
| Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 6:17pm | #30 |
|---|---|
|
Suit yourself. |
| Offline | Link |